History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potts v. Hayden
249 So. 2d 726
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1971
Check Treatment

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

MANN, Judge.

The order appealed from is not final as to these parties. It is therefore not appeal-able until after final judgment. There is no provision in F.A.R. 4.2, 32 F.S.A., for interlocutory review of a “final” summary judgment on a counterclaim while the main claim between the parties is pending. The motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice to the right of appeal from final judgment. See Midstate Hauling Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Fla.App. 4th 1966, 189 So.2d 826.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Potts v. Hayden
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 2, 1971
Citation: 249 So. 2d 726
Docket Number: No. 71-207
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.