History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potts v. . Motor Co.
131 S.E. 739
N.C.
1926
Check Treatment

Civil action to recover damages. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto, were as follows:

"1. Was the Apperson car destroyed by fire after defendant had received possession of it under the contract sued on? Answer: Yes. *Page 822

"2. Was said fire caused by the negligence of said Cobb Motor Company? Answer: Yes.

"3. What damage is plaintiff entitled to recover from defendant? Answer: $356.00."

There was a judgment rendered on the verdict. Defendant excepted and assigned error. In the record there are six assignments of error made by defendant. We have examined the six assignments of error with care and can find no error in law. The jury has found the facts for plaintiff.

In the judgment there is

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Potts v. . Motor Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 3, 1926
Citation: 131 S.E. 739
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.