History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potter v. Lumsden
93 N.J. Eq. 476
N.J.
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

*484For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Potter v. Lumsden
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 9, 1922
Citation: 93 N.J. Eq. 476
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.