History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potter v. Lefebvre
95 N.H. 482
| N.H. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

The ruling of the Trial Court was correct. The law upon this point is correctly stated in the Restatement, Conflict of Laws, s. 603, as follows: "If action is barred by the statute of limitations of the forum, no action can be maintained though action is not barred in the state where the cause of action arose." See also, Connecticut c. Co. v. Railroad, 78 N.H. 553,555. The order, therefore, is

Exceptions overruled.

*Page 483

Case Details

Case Name: Potter v. Lefebvre
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 7, 1949
Citation: 95 N.H. 482
Docket Number: No. 3818.
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.