History
  • No items yet
midpage
Potter v. Froment
47 Cal. 165
Cal.
1873
Check Treatment
By the Court:

The complaint does not allege any special damage sustained by the plaintiff, and it was, therefore, error to admit evidence of the cost of boiling and skimming water for household purposes. So, the complaint failing to allege that the- plaintiff rented the farm, or was prevented from renting it by reason of the discoloration of the water in the stream, proof of diminution of rental value was inadmissible.

The cause is remanded with directions to strike out so much of the judgment as awards damages, appellant to recover costs of appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Potter v. Froment
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1873
Citation: 47 Cal. 165
Docket Number: 3,210
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.