History
  • No items yet
midpage
Post v. Harber
92 Ohio St. 3d 434
Ohio
2001
Check Treatment

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs in judgment only. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A, and Todd 0. Rosenberg, for appellants. Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Steven G. LaForge and Barbara Kozar Letcher, for appellee Ohio Farmers Insurance Company. Mann & Preston, L.L.P., and Mark A Preston, for appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Case Details

Case Name: Post v. Harber
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 8, 2001
Citation: 92 Ohio St. 3d 434
Docket Number: No. 01-539
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.