54 Iowa 198 | Iowa | 1880
In all that the defendant did he appears to have acted honestly, and with no intention other than to assist the widow in the proper management and disposition of the estate. The notes appear to have been deposited by him with Kapler as a friend and neighbor, and because Kapler had a safe in which they could be kept. When this was done does not distinctly appear, but if it was done before the plaintiff’s appointment it could hardly be regarded as an interference with the estate. It was not, to be sure, the defendant’s right to use the money collected in payment of the debts of the estate, even though done by the widow’s consent and under her direction. Still there is no pretense that the debts were not due, and that the estate did not derive the whole benefit of the payments. In taking some of the notes from Kapler and delivering them to the widow the defendant may have been guilty of an interference, but it is not shown to us that the estate sustained any damage.
It appeal’s to us that the plaintiff’s claim has very small foundation. Possibly the plaintiff should have been allowed nominal damages, but we cannot reverse upon such ground. Watson v. Van Meter, 43 Iowa, 76.
Akfirmed.