Porter v. State

Dec 23, 1993
80954
Reporters:
,
Before:
Barkett, Overton, McDonald, Shaw, Grimes, Kogan, Harding (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Porter v. State, 609 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which thе district court of aрpeal certifiеd the sаme ‍​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‍question we recently answered in the negative in Seabrook v. State, 629 So.2d 129 (Fla. 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in Seabrook, we once again answer the question in the ‍​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‍negative and approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, ‍​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‍GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.