Porter v. GoordPorter v. Goord
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassing a prison employee and committing a sexual offense in violation of the prison disciplinary rules. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, which determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This
The misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officer who authored it and the testimony of the prison employee that petitioner harassed, together with the videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner‘s guilt (see Matter of Ruggiero v Goord, 19 AD3d 907, 908 [2005]; Matter of Goncalves v Berbary, 14 AD3d 743, 744 [2005]). The record does not support petitioner‘s claim that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination of guilt flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Black v Goord, 12 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2004]; Matter of Johnson v Ricks,
Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.