History
  • No items yet
midpage
187 So. 3d 945
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2016
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing with the trial court a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011) (recognizing that rule 3.800(a) places the burden on the movant to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record); Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002) (noting that a claim raised in a motion under 3.800(a) must be capable of being resolved as a matter of law, without an evidentiary determination, and on the face of the existing court record).

Case Details

Case Name: Porkolab v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 23, 2016
Citations: 187 So. 3d 945; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495; 2016 WL 1133702; No. 3D15-429
Docket Number: No. 3D15-429
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In