History
  • No items yet
midpage
Popper v. Spelz
184 Ill. App. 35
Ill. App. Ct.
1913
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Guaranty, § 3*—when officer of corporation not liable. An officer of a corporation refused to sign a form guarantying payment of the corporation’s order hut marked the order with the letters “O. K.,” and his clerk without authority wrote the seller in his name, the seller that the “O. K..” would have to suffice as a guaranty. The alleged guarantor testified the clerk had no authority to write such letter, that it was not written in accordance with the directions given and that he marked the order as an approval. Held, a guaranty was not established and a verdict should have been directed. 3. Guaranty, § 12*—scope of liability. The liability of a guarantor is limited to the express terms of his undertaking and cannot be extended by implication.

Case Details

Case Name: Popper v. Spelz
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 2, 1913
Citation: 184 Ill. App. 35
Docket Number: Gen. No. 18,817
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.