History
  • No items yet
midpage
Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad
90 A. 787
| N.H. | 1914
|
Check Treatment

There is no special rule which excludes evidence like that admitted subject to exception; and as it was relevant to the issue of the witness' credibility, the exception to its admission raises no question of law. Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N.H. 308, 311, 312; Kelland v. Company, 75 N.H. 168,170; Curtice v. Dixon, 74 N.H. 386, 397.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Poore v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: May 5, 1914
Citation: 90 A. 787
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.