History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pooler v. Maples
1 Wend. 65
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1828
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The motion must be granted. Though the domicil of the witness be in this state, he resides out of the state, within the meaning of the statute, which was intended to facilitate the obtaining the testimony of witnesses who were beyond the reach of the process of our courts, and whose personal attendance at the trial could not be enforced.

Case Details

Case Name: Pooler v. Maples
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1828
Citation: 1 Wend. 65
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.