71 N.C. 101 | N.C. | 1874
Th% application being fora special injunction and the property in custodia legis, the Court will not let go the property and allow the same to be sold, if there is a probability that the merits are with the plaintiff notwithstanding the denial in the answer. But here there is no denial in the answer, the material facts are admitted. Heileg v. Stokes, 63 N. C. R., 612; Jarman v. Saunders, 64 N. C. R., 368; Craycroff v. Morehead and wife, 67 N. C. R., 422; Brown, Daniel & Co., v. Hawkins, 65 N. C. R., 645.
Upon this ground therefore, we sustain the ruling of his Honor in refusing to dissolve the injunction.
The well prepared brief of plaintiff’s counsel, has made our task an easy one.
There is no error. This will be certified to the end, &c.
Pee CuRUM. Judgment affirmed.