History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ponder v. Grant
16 Ga. App. 629
Ga. Ct. App.
1915
Check Treatment
Bkoyles, J.

1. The only issue in this case is one of fact, and, that having been resolved by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, their finding will not be disturbed.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is wholly without merit. The documentary evidence in question is merely cumulative in character; its subject-matter was testified to upon the trial, and, in its^ attempted introduction, the movant failed to meet the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6086.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ponder v. Grant
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 30, 1915
Citation: 16 Ga. App. 629
Docket Number: 6139
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.