Pollina v. BlattPollina v. Blatt
—In an action to recover payment on a guarantee of a mortgage note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated March 27, 1998, as denied that branch of his motion which was
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff.
A guarantee is a separate undertaking and may impose lesser or greater collateral responsibility on the guarantor (see, American Trading Co. v Fish,
The remaining contentions of the defendant Jacqueline Blatt are without merit. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.