In the Matter of POLISH YOUTH ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents, v DOM, INCORPORATED, et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
909 N.Y.S.2d 372
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to
Here, the appellants sought leave to serve an amended answer, inter alia, to add an “affirmative defense of and counterclaim for” common-law dissolution of the petitioner Polish Youth Association on behalf of the individual appellants. However, the proposed amendment was palpably insufficient insofar as it failed to include any allegations that the individual appellants were minority shareholders of Polish Youth Association (see Matter of Sternberg [Osman], 181 AD2d 897, 898 [1992]; Lewis v Jones, 107 AD2d 931, 932-933 [1985]; cf. Matter of Edgewater Point Prop. Owners’ Assn., 4 AD3d 526 [2004]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer (see Ricca v Valenti, 24 AD3d 647, 648 [2005]).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the appellants’ remaining contentions. Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Florio and Lott, JJ., concur.
