History
  • No items yet
midpage
Poitier v. State
533 So. 2d 901
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1988
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The prosecutor’s final argument, while improper, see Redish v. State, 525 So.2d 928 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), did not, beyond a reasonable doubt, amount to harmful error. State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Hall v. State, 444 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Poitier v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 15, 1988
Citation: 533 So. 2d 901
Docket Number: No. 86-2385
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In