41 S.E.2d 157 | Ga. | 1947
1. A judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding, being reviewable, is conclusive on the question of the legality or illegality of the alleged detention (Day v. Smith,
2. The only attempt at pleading in the present instance — being a written "motion" to set aside a judgment rendered in a habeas corpus proceeding, but being without service of any copy or process or rule nisi or other appropriate order of the court — entirely failed to meet the requirements of either of the above-stated proceedings for setting aside a judgment and to call into question the validity of the judgment here. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the "motion."
Judgment affirmed. All the Justicesconcur.