Plunkett v. Board of Pension Commissioners

114 N.J.L. 273 | N.J. | 1935

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellob, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dostges, Peeskie, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

midpage