History
  • No items yet
midpage
Plumb v. M'Crea
12 Johns. 491
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1815
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The replication of de injuria suapropña,, &<?., is bad, according to the rule laid down in Crogateh ease, and recognized by the court, in Lytle v. Lee & Ruggles, (5 Johns. Rep. 113. This is a pléa good only where the matter alleged is by way of excuse, and not where it is insisted upon as giving 'a right. (1 Chitty’s Pl. 562, 3, 4.) The pleas are good and sufficient, if true, to bar the plaintiff’s right of recovery. If the cattle were forfeited by the act of, congress, the property was devested by the ac-t of flip plaintiff.. ■ .

Judgment for the defendants, :

Case Details

Case Name: Plumb v. M'Crea
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1815
Citation: 12 Johns. 491
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.