History
  • No items yet
midpage
PLOPPER v. State
2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2008
|
Check Treatment
250 S.W.3d 442 (2008)

Otto PLOPPER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 90066.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 22, 2008.

S. Rristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anna L. Bunch, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otto Plopper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the sentence imposed upon Plopper was not unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: PLOPPER v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 22, 2008
Citation: 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 559
Docket Number: ED 90066
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.