On January 16, 1987, plaintiff commenced a class action on behalf of himself and other unidentified parties seeking the return of deposits and statutory damages in connection with the purchase of town-homes in the Valley Greene Village housing development, located in the borough of Wyomissing Hills, Berks County, Pennsylvania. Defendants filed a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer, Pa;R.C.P. 1017(b)(4). We granted that motion and
Plaintiff based his claim on the Pennsylvania Uniform Condominium Act, 68Pa.C.S. §3101-3414. The act requires a seller or declarant of a condominium to deliver a public offering statement to the buyer.
The issue to be decided is thus one of law: Are the Valley Greene Village townhomes condominiums under the Pennsylvania Uniform Condominium Act?
The act defines a condominium as follows:
“Real estate portions of which are designated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners of those portions. Real estate is not a condominium unless the undivided interests in the common elements are vested in the unit owners.”
Thus, in order for a residential unit to comply with the definition of a condominium, two requirements must be met. First, the development must contain common elements, and second, the undivided interests in the common elements must be vested with the unit owners.
The common areas to the Valley Greene Village
The distinction between common areas being owned by an association or by individual unit holders is crucial. The Pennsylvania Legislature adopted the definition of condominiums in its entirety from the Uniform Condominium Act.
A search of judicial precedent by those states that have adopted the Uniform Condominium Act turns up only one case that deals squarely with the issue before us today. In Country Greens Village One Owners’ Association Inc. v. Meyers, 281 S.E. 2d 346, Ga. App. 609 (1981), the Georgia appeals court held that the development was not a condominium under the Uniform Condominium Act adopted by the Georgia Legislature because ownership of the common grounds was held by an association rather than by individual unit holders.
Therefore, given the clear legislative intent of the Uniform Condominium Act and the judicial interpretation of this issue from another jurisdiction that
. 68 Pa.C.S. §3406(a).
. 68 Pa.C.S. §3406(c).
. 68 Pa.C.S. §3103.
. See Article 1 of the declaration.
. See Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition of the Uniform Condominium Act §1-103(7).
. See Uniform Laws Annotated, Master Edition §1-103 comments, page 436.
