History
  • No items yet
midpage
Platt v. Haner
27 Mich. 167
Mich.
1873
Check Treatment
The Court

held that parol evidence of the contents of a United States patent is inadmissible; for, if the patent itself is lost or not accessible, the proof by exemplification from the general land office is equivalent in degree and should be obtained.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Platt v. Haner
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 23, 1873
Citation: 27 Mich. 167
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.