5 Mass. App. Ct. 770 | Mass. App. Ct. | 1977
The plaintiffs, the planning board, three individual members of the city council and the mayor of the city of Taunton, filed an appeal in a District Court alleging that they were “aggrieved,” within the meaning of G. L. c. 40A, § 21, as amended through St. 1973, c. 1114, § 4, by a decision of the zoning board of appeals of Taunton.
So ordered.
General Laws c. 40A, § 17, as appearing in St. 1975, c. 808, § 3, has no application to this case.
The issue whether the plaintiffs fall within the stautory definition of persons “aggrieved” is not before us.