History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pitts v. State
25 Ga. App. 31
Ga. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the accused, and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not interfere. The judgment overruling the motion for a now trial is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. M. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error, cited Dorsey v. State, 108 Ga. 477. C. H. Porter, solicitor-general, E. S. Taylor, contra,

cited: Duggan v. State, 116 Ga. 846; Jackson v. State, 322, 329.

Case Details

Case Name: Pitts v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 3, 1920
Citation: 25 Ga. App. 31
Docket Number: 11174
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.