Pitts v. State
114 Ga. 35 | Ga. | 1901
1. Taking into view both the evidence and the statement of the accused, it does not appear that the court below erred in refusing to sustain the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.
2. The newly discovered evidence was not of such materiality or importance as that the introduction of it upon another trial would probably bring about a different result.
3. While it is much the better practice to charge concerning the prisoner’s statement in the language of the statute, failure to do so is not cause for a new
Judgment affirmed.