Pitonack v. State, 572 So. 2d 1041

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the imposition of costs in the sentence and remand so that the trial judge may either strike the costs or conduct a hearing to impose costs. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We also reverse the imposition of public defender fees as this record does not reflect notice and the opportunity to be heard prior to imposition. Therefore, Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989) is not controlling. We decline to again certify the question already certified in Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

STONE, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pitonack v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jan 23, 1991

Citations: 572 So. 2d 1041; 1991 WL 4321; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 402; No. 90-1109

Docket Number: No. 90-1109

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.