History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pitonack v. State
572 So. 2d 1041
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the imposition of costs in the sentence and remand so that the trial judge may either strike the costs or conduct a hearing to impose costs. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We also reverse the imposition of public defender fees as this record does not reflect notice and the opportunity to be heard prior to imposition. Therefore, Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989) is not controlling. We decline to again certify the question already certified in Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

STONE, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pitonack v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 23, 1991
Citation: 572 So. 2d 1041
Docket Number: No. 90-1109
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.