History
  • No items yet
midpage
Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
247 A.2d 667
N.J.
1968
Check Treatment
Pee Ctjriam:.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 456.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN - 7.

For reversal — Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 25, 1968
Citation: 247 A.2d 667
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.