174 A.D.2d 1041 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1991
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: We find that there was substantial evidence supporting the State Division of Human Rights’ (SDHR) determination that petitioners unlawfully discriminated against complainant because he had been convicted of a crime (see, Executive Law § 296 [15]; Correction Law § 752; see also, State Div. of Human Rights v Sorrento Cheese Co., 115 AD2d 323).