Getting possession of the plaintiff’s horse by process against a third person, with the intention of fraudulently depriving the plaintiff of his property, and afterwards taking the horse out of the Commonwealth, were sufficient evidence of a conversion. Exceptions overruled, with double costs.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
