History
  • No items yet
midpage
PIN v. Kramer
295 Conn. 911
Conn.
2010
Check Treatment
989 A.2d 1074 (2010)
295 Conn. 911

Erik M. PIN et al.
v.
David L. KRAMER et al.

SC 18572

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 3, 2010.

Daniel E. Ryan III, Stamford, in support of the petition.

Lawrence F. Reilly, Greenwich, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 ConnApp. 33, 986 A.2d 1101 (2010), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court incorrectly failed to give a curative instruction and, if so, was such failure harmful?"

ROGERS, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Case Details

Case Name: PIN v. Kramer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Mar 3, 2010
Citation: 295 Conn. 911
Docket Number: SC 18572
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.