History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pilster v. Highton
31 P. 580
Cal.
1892
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The complaint was demurred to upon the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and was ambiguous and uncertain. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant given ten days to answer. He declined to answer, and thereupon judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals. The complaint was inartistically drawn, but we think it must be held sufficient. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pilster v. Highton
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 26, 1892
Citation: 31 P. 580
Docket Number: No. 14,510
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.