History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pilato v. Kapur
216 Conn. 813
Conn.
1990
Check Treatment

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 282, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a case referred to an attorney trial referee, is the decision whether to award interest as an element of damages within the province of the attorney trial referee or the trial court?
“2. Should the Appellate Court have remanded the case with direction that the determination of whether interest should be allowed be made by the attorney trial referee who had heard the case and had refused to award interest upon a ground later determined to be erroneous?
“3. Should the Appellate Court have complied with General Statutes § 51-183c in remanding the case?”

Case Details

Case Name: Pilato v. Kapur
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Sep 18, 1990
Citation: 216 Conn. 813
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.