History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pike v. Wasserman
30 N.Y.S. 952
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1894
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Both being actions in the supreme court, there seems to be no doubt but that this court has the power to restrain the trial of one until the final disposition of the other, if justice demands it. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, and order granted restraining the trial of the action *954subsequently brought until the final determination of the action first instituted; $10 costs and disbursements of the appeal to the appellant

Case Details

Case Name: Pike v. Wasserman
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 12, 1894
Citation: 30 N.Y.S. 952
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.