History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pike v. Lowell
32 Me. 245
Me.
1850
Check Treatment
Tenney, J.,

orally.—The distinction drawn by the plaintiff’s counsel cannot be sustained. There is nothing in the statute, from which it can be inferred. Limitation laws are arbitrary, but they are binding.

Judgment for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Pike v. Lowell
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1850
Citation: 32 Me. 245
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.