History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pike v. Bugbee
293 Conn. 923
Conn.
2009
Check Treatment
980 A.2d 912 (2009)
293 Conn. 923

Jordan PIKE
v.
Blake BUGBEE et al.

No. 18456.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

September 23, 2009.

Juri E. Taalman, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Peter J. Ponziani and Christopher J. Sochacki, Avon, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 820, 974 A.2d 743 (2009), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly granted the defendant's motion to strike the plaintiff's claims in negligence?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly granted the defendant's motion to strike the claim of parental liability pursuant to General Statutes § 52-572?"

PALMER and VERTEFEUILLE, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Case Details

Case Name: Pike v. Bugbee
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Sep 23, 2009
Citation: 293 Conn. 923
Docket Number: 18456
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.