| N.J. | Feb 1, 1923

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justic-t Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bekgen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — JSTone.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.