Pietsch v. Stirling Home Builders, Inc.

98 N.J.L. 569 | N.J. | 1923

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justic-t Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bekgen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — JSTone.

midpage