History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pierce v. Stevens
30 Me. 184
Me.
1849
Check Treatment
Tenney, J. orally.

— Without any stipulation to the contrary, a mortgagee of either real or personal estate is entitled to immediate possession. But the parties may legally contract that the possession may remain with the mortgager. As to personal property, such an agreement does not contradict the *185mortgage, and may be proved by parol. A plaintiff having no right to the possession, cannot maintain replevin.

Exceptions sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: Pierce v. Stevens
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1849
Citation: 30 Me. 184
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.