Pierce v. StatePierce v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Broyles
Broyles, C. J.
D. W. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
■John 0. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.
The accused was convicted of manufacturing whisky. The evidence, while authorizing a finding that he was guilty of an attempt to manufacture whisky, was insufficient to support the verdict, and the refusal to grant him a new trial was error. As this ruling is controlling in the case, the special assignments of error are not dealt with.
Judgment reversed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.