History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pierce v. Kusic
56 Vt. 418
Vt.
1883
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rowell, J.

The Homestead Act provides that “ the homestead of a housekeeper or head of a family, consisting of a dwelling-house, out-buildings, and the land used in connection therewith, not exceeding five hundred dollars in value, and used *420or kept by suck housekeeper or head of a family as a homestead, shall * * * be exempt from attachment and execution, except,” etc. R. L.-s. 1894.

Perry Marsh was a housekeeper, and used the demanded premises as a homestead, which in character and value fulfilled all the requirements of the statute, and the case comes not within its exception.

Therefore said premises were exempt from attachment and execution.

• Let the judgment be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pierce v. Kusic
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Oct 15, 1883
Citation: 56 Vt. 418
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.