History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pierce v. Johnson
34 Conn. 274
Conn.
1867
Check Treatment
McCurdy, J,

In this case the facts appearing in the motion are that the plaintiff sold a yoke of oxen to the defendants, Charles S. Johnson and Charles B. Johnson. The purchasers intended them for said Charles B. and his brother Bennett H. Johnson. But this fact was not disclosed by the purchasers to the plaintiff nor was it known by him. The sale was directly to the defendants and to them alone. They therefore are bound to pay the price as they agreed.

It would be a monstrous principle that a person buying an article in his own name and on his own credit could screen himself from liability for payment upon the ground that he had bought it under a secret understanding that he was the agent of a bankrupt. 1 Swift Dig., 330.

There is nothing erroneous in the judgment.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Pierce v. Johnson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Aug 15, 1867
Citation: 34 Conn. 274
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.