History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pickman v. Georgetown County
130 S.C. 18
S.C.
1924
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

November 11, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge Shipp, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MARION concurs in result.

MR. JUSTICE FRASER disqualified, did not participate.






Concurrence Opinion

I concur in the result upon the ground that the verification of the complaint is insufficient, and that the application is not supported by affidavits.

I do not agree to the statement: "Even if the Acts were unconstitutional, the acts of a de facto officer cannot be attacked, except by some one holding the lawful title of the office."

This is, generally speaking, true, but the principle does not apply where there is no office legally created; the rule being that where there is no office, there can neither be an officer de jure nor de facto. Norton v. Shelby County,118 U.S. 425; 6 S.Ct., 1121; 30 L.Ed., 178. Carleton v.People, 10 Mich., 259. Lang v. Bayonne,74 N.J. Law, 455; 68 A., 90; 15 L.R.A. (N.S.), 93; 122 Am. St. Rep., 391; 12 Ann. Cas., 961.

Case Details

Case Name: Pickman v. Georgetown County
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Nov 11, 1924
Citation: 130 S.C. 18
Docket Number: 11601
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.