Picciotto v. RGB RiverboatPicciotto v. RGB Riverboat
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Robin Piccioto, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion to dismiss of defendants, RGB Riverboat, d/b/a Grand Victoria Casino, Elgin; Elgin Riverboat Resort, d/b/a Grand Victoria Casino, Elgin; and Gold Strike, Inc., based upon the statute of limitations. We affirm.
The record indicates that on January 15, 1997, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants, her former employers, seeking damages for an injury plaintiff suffered on January 16, 1995, while working as a crew member on defendants’ vessel. Plaintiff sought damages for claims under the
On September 27, 1999, plaintiff refiled her complaint. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the refiled complaint. On March 30, 2000, the trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiffs claims were barred by section 763(a) of the Jones Act (
•1 The issue on appeal is whether Illinois’ “saving” statute, section 13—217 of the Code of Civil Procedure (
•2 The Appellate Court, First District, has recognized that Congress enacted
Plaintiff acknowledges the holdings of the First District in Ciers and Stephan but invites this court to depart from those holdings. We believe that the First District’s reasoning in Ciers and Stephan is sound. Consequently, we determine that
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the circuit court of Kane County is affirmed.
Affirmed.
HUTCHINSON, P.J., and GEOMETER, J., concur.