History
  • No items yet
midpage
Philpot v. Webb
20 Ind. 509
Ind.
1863
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Henry G. Waggoner died in 1859, then owning certain real estate, and he left surviving him Matilda Waggoner, his widow, and Eliza J. Philpot and several others,' his children by said Matilda, being his heirs at law.

Afterward,in September, 1860, said Matilda executed, jointly and severally, with William Henderson, two promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to 866 dollars and 66 cents, payable to George W. Webb. Later, to-wit, in November, 1860, the widow, Matilda, intermarried with said Henderson; and, on the 20th of March following, (1861), she died, leaving- surviving her no children by her second husband.

On the 6th of June, 1862, Webb, the payee of the above mentioned notes, instituted this suit to enforce payment of them out of the interest of said Matilda in the real estate of her first husband, she having left no other property, and Henderson being insolvent, The suit is against her children by her first husband, the heirs of Henry G. Waggoner, deceased. It is alleged that there is no administrator.

The Court held that one-third of the real estate of her first husband, Waggoner, descended to the said Matilda, in fee; that her subsequent marriage did not divest it; and that at her death it descended to her heirs, liable to be sold for debtB contracted by her.

Concurring in the opinion of the Court below, we affirm the judgment, with costs.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Philpot v. Webb
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1863
Citation: 20 Ind. 509
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.