midpage

Phillips v. StatePhillips v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 20, 1998
No. 90681
Versions:719 So. 2d 882
23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422
1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484
1998 WL 608234
PER CURIAM.

We have for review Phillips v. State, 689 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with Johnson v. State, 569 So.2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In J.B. v. State, 705 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1998), we resolved this conflict, holding that the allowance of a confession or an admission against interest without independent proof of the corpus delicti requires a contemporaneous objection to preserve the issue for appeal. Id. at 1378. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Phillips v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Aug 20, 1998
Citations: 719 So. 2d 882; 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422; 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484; 1998 WL 608234; No. 90681
Docket Number: No. 90681
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In