142 Fla. 270 | Fla. | 1940
Lead Opinion
Appellant has attached to and made a part of her motion to diminish the record of testimony, all the material evidence *271 which she contends supports her grounds for reversal. This evidence has been examined and found insufficient to reverse the decree of the chancellor.
In this situation, it follows that there being no ground for reversal, there is no reason to bring the cause to this Court, so the motion for suit money and counsel's fees must be and is hereby denied. We would be inclined to grant the motion to diminish the testimony but it becomes unnecessary to rule on that question.
It is so ordered.
TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J. J., concur.
THOMAS, J., dissents.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent. See Chisholm v. Chisholm,