Plaintiff/appellant Phillips sued defendants/appellees for fraud arising out of the alleged breach of an oral employment agreement. Following the presentation of appellant’s evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of appellees. We affirm.
“In order for a fraud to be actionable, the representation relied on must be more than a promise which is void or unenforceable. See
Ely v. Stratoflex,
Under Georgia law the promise allegedly made by appellees is unenforceable and cannot form the basis for fraud. “It is well settled that ‘(a)lthough fraud can be predicated on a misrepresentation as to a future event where the defendant knows the future event will not take place . . . fraud cannot be predicated on a promise which is unenforceable at the time it is made.’
Beasley v. Ponder,
Judgment affirmed.
