Phillips v. Koogler

Feb 11, 1913
4507
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Dunn
DUNN, J.

This case comes to this court on appeal from a judgment of the ‍‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‍district court of Atoka county. The sufficiency of the case-made to support the petition in error‘filed is challenged by a motion, which must be sustained for the ‍‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‍reason that it does not appear from the record or otherwise that the defendant in error was present either personally or by counsel at the settlement, or ‍‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‍that notice of the timé thereof was served or waived, or what amendments suggested, if any, were allowed or disallowed.

No answer is made to the motion; ‍‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‍and, the record before us sustaining the same, the proceeding is dismissed. See Pirst Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 Pac. 748, and cases therein cited.

HAYES, ‍‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‍C. J., and KANE and TURNER, JJ., concur; AVIDLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.