History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phillips v. Koogler
35 Okla. 438
Okla.
1913
Check Treatment

This case comes to this court on appeal from a judgment of the district court of Atoka county. The sufficiency of the case-made to support the petition in error filed is challenged by a motion, which must be sustained for the reason that it does not appear from the record or otherwise that the defendant in error was present either personally or by counsel at the settlement, or that notice of the time thereof was served or waived, or what amendments suggested, if any, were allowed or disallowed.

No answer is made to the motion; and, the record before us sustaining the same, the proceeding is dismissed. See FirstNat. Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383,108 P. 748, and cases therein cited.

HAYES, C. J., and KANE and TURNER, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Phillips v. Koogler
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Feb 11, 1913
Citation: 35 Okla. 438
Docket Number: 4507
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.