History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phillips's Appeal
10 Sadler 249
Pa.
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

It is wholly unnecessary for us to enter upon the discussion of a case so utterly wanting of equity as the one in hand. The court below has said all that was required to show the fallacy of the appellant’s complaint; and we have, therefore, nothing to do but concur in the decree.

The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at costs of appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Phillips's Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 30, 1888
Citation: 10 Sadler 249
Docket Number: No. 6
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.